The ultimate question, the query that launched a thousand
ships. Yeah, not really, but it is something to consider. So, are you team
paperback or team hardback. If an unknown randomer came at you would you want your
chosen book of the week to make them laugh as you bang them over the head with it
or give them a concussion?
That is a very serious question…
So moving along from the silliness serious
considerations above let’s get to answering the question.
Cue the bullet points.
Ø Hardbacks
are more expensive. Sad but true. Unless you go into you local works and you
can probably pick up the latest tome by Stephen king for under £4.
Ø But
hardbacks come out first. (don’t tell anyone but I think it is a conspiracy
shhh)
Ø Hardbacks
are heavy – handy for concussing that unknown randomer, not so much for
slipping into your bag and taking to work or school with you every day.
Ø They look
so pretty on the shelf though… - true…yip, I’ll have to come back to that one.
Ø The dust
jackets always end up ripped or buckled or SOMETHING. (all dust jackets are out
to get me I tell you)
Ø And, when
all else fails hardbacks are brilliant when you need your telly to be lifted off
the table by a few more inches :)
Personally I am a paperback lover myself. Paperbacks are so
much easier to curl up with…hardbacks are just bulky.
Saying that I am not totally against hardbacks, I do own some
;) most of them are books that I couldn’t wait patiently for to come out in
paperback. And I don’t know about you but I would much rather have a hardback
sized hardback book than a hardback sized novel with a paper cover – especially
when it seems you are being charged the same price for the privilege. *cough*
fix *cough*
So, paperback or hardback?
I totally agree with you! I love hardbacks because the covers can REALLY be gorgeous, but Paperback is just so much easier to handle! :)
ReplyDeleteGreat post!!! :)
www.blogofabookaholic.blogspot.com
Absolutely paperback! :)
ReplyDeleteValentina
www.peekabook.it